It will not be superfluous to recall this! Sign 3.1 Entry is prohibited in the common people it is called Brick. This sign regulates various traffic situations on the road. For driving under a brick, depending on the situation, there is a punishment. Situation one. Sign 3.1 regulates a one-way road,…

Road under a brick. (not always deprivation).

Sign 3.1 Entry is prohibited in the common people it is called Brick. This sign regulates various traffic situations on the road. For driving under a brick, depending on the situation, there is a punishment.

Situation one.
Sign 3.1 regulates a one-way road, think hard before entering under this sign. Driving under a brick in this situation indicates that you, in violation of traffic rules, entered the lane intended for the movement of vehicles in the opposite direction. This threatens with a fine of 5,000 rubles or, in the worst case, deprivation of the right to drive a vehicle for a period of 4 to 6 months. Article 12.16 part 3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.

Situation two.
Sign 3.1 Separates the flow of vehicles, for example: driving under the brick in the parking lot or gas station. In this case, a fine of 500 rubles threatens, or if the traffic police inspector is in a good mood, you can get off with a warning. Article 12.16 part 1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.

Articles of the Code of Administrative Offenses and FINES 2015 look at LINK

Comments 84

– (a phrase from the original text) or if the traffic police inspector is in a good mood, you can get off with a warning. Article 12.16 part 1 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.
The inspectors are always in such a good mood that they absolutely do not care – they will scratch for deprivation to the fullest!) hahaha

Yes, we know it

This threatens with a fine of 5,000 rubles or, in the worst case, deprivation of the right to drive a vehicle for a period of 4 to 6 months. Article 12.16 part 3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.
Hehe) Optimistic) Rather, on the contrary, it threatens with deprivation, and under the best circumstances, a fine of 5000 rubles.

According to the Rules of the Road, according to Art. 9.1 the side intended for oncoming traffic is considered to be half the width of the carriageway, located on the left. However, this definition cannot refer to a one-way road.

Article 12.15.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation should be applied only when paragraph 9.2 or 9.3 of the SDA is violated:
9.2 On two-way roads with four lanes or more, it is prohibited to enter the side of the road intended for oncoming traffic.
9.3 On two-way roads with three lanes marked with markings (with the exception of marking 1.9), of which the middle one is used for traffic in both directions, it is allowed to enter this lane only for overtaking, bypassing, turning left or turning around. It is forbidden to drive into the leftmost lane intended for oncoming traffic.

The rest must be carried out in accordance with the relevant articles of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, which do not provide for deprivation of rights, tk.There is no oncoming lane on the road with one -way traffic.
Responsibility for travel 3.1 “Entrance is prohibited” is determined by Article 12.16 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation “Non -compliance with the requirements prescribed by road signs or marking the roadway”,

If at least the judges understood this that the inspectors did not break through there … The frontal armor is strong, but even 99% of the judges do not understand this. It is a pity, well, but we’ll live somehow …-This is approximately how you go 45, where the sign is 20, and you get 2 times a multiple of speed, although there is a direct article for punishment-for exceeding 20 km per hour.

The road will master the walking …

Unfortunately, we will only overpower the road with a pack of bucks for a couple of lawyers in your pocket.

Never give up. Riping your hands, rather stretch your legs.

According to the rules of the road, according to Art. 9.1 “a side intended for oncoming traffic is considered half the width of the carriageway located on the left.” However, this definition cannot relate to one -way road.

Article 12.15.4 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation should be applied only when paragraph 9.2 or 9.3 of the SDA is violated:
9.2 on two -way roads with four stripes or more, it is forbidden to go to the side of the road intended for oncoming traffic.
9.3 on two -way roads with three stripes indicated by markings (with the exception of marking 1.9), of which the average is used for movement in both directions, it is allowed to go into this strip only for overtaking, detour, turning to the left or reversal. It is forbidden to travel to the extreme left strip intended for oncoming traffic.

The rest should take place according to the relevant articles of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, which do not provide for deprivation of rights, because There is no oncoming lane on the road with one -way traffic.
Responsibility for travel 3.1 “Entrance is prohibited” is determined by Article 12.16 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation “Non -compliance with the requirements prescribed by road signs or marking the roadway”,

12.16 h. 3
Movement in the oncoming direction along the road with one -sided movement

Fulfillment 5000 rub. or deprivation of the right to drive a vehicle for a period of 4 to 6 months.

They took someone else's text and removed the most important. Without links to the Code of Administrative Offenses, this is just a text without practical benefit. Add Code of Administrative Offenses.

Later I will add (not from the phone) the Code of Administrative Offenses themselves. There are indicated.

At the gas station, the installation of bricks is illegal, ignoring.

why? If the sign is agreed with the owner.

It was too radically expressed) The interpretation of movement under the brick at gas stations, parking and courtyards as a movement on the oncoming lane is illegal.

It is useless to explain to her, there is still no head in her year, and the fee is unlawed! So do not try, major is always right, she has all the nuts)) because they do not let go for the violation, but they write a fine, or they take the grandmas))

Yes, it was a case in the courtyard in the courtyard of a brick on the one hand and grazed me, I proved to them that I live here and all the norms. They said on the other hand, come in where there is no sign I answered you and you need to stop by yourself

It was also in the first situation, escaped with two thousand like, although they asked more)

Daaaa, I locked myself under the brick IIII … 20 thousand rubles bounced out of his pocket. Now I look at both)))

20 rubles – a lot! Lots of! Maximum 1000 gave)

Well, what to do, it is to blame! 5000 penalty and 15000 the right person. From now on, I will be more attentive.

As the practice of 5000 shows on the paw, the nut is usually enough.

If they are in vita

Aaaa. Well, that is a given. There are not always …

As the practice of 5000 shows on the paw, the nut is usually enough.

I got to the head of the traffic police …

Litvinovoleg

Daaaa, I locked myself under the brick IIII … 20 thousand rubles bounced out of his pocket. Now I look at both)))

Nichrome you have fines! O_O

I just got to the head of the traffic police and the result …

By analogy, he would add a continuous intersection (including double). Also different articles and punishment for intersection for turning/turning/rebuilding and related to traveling to the oncoming lane.

In St. Petersburg, they tried to breed so next to Staronevsky. There is a road for public transport, and all the rest are brick.
When I realized that there were no meetings there and write the protocol, the traffic police simply lagged behind.

When I received the rights, the Gaytsy divorced so …

In St. Petersburg, they tried to breed so next to Staronevsky. There is a road for public transport, and all the rest are brick.
When I realized that there were no meetings there and write the protocol, the traffic police simply lagged behind.

What punishment is for this?

Then there was some fine, a small one hundred rubles like?
Now more expensive, but also a little. T.K. Not a oncoming lane, but non -compliance with signs. Or movement in the lane for public transport.

12.17 part1 of the movement of vehicles in the lane for route vehicles or
Stop on the specified strip in violation of the rules of the road, with the exception of the case provided for in paragraph 1.2
This article is a fine of 1500 rubles.

Yes, then there were no these stripes and fines for them)

))) well then approx. Yes, the ministers are cunning – they can be under a brick)))

I was in situation number 2. DPS wrote that the oncoming lane and deprivation. I had a Sumel judge to prove that the “brick” was not a comrade-in-law took my side and was a fine of 500 rubles.

I was able to prove, but otherwise it is not to survive on the roads, it comes to prove on the road. And who is easy now?)))

Did you write a complaint about the Gayts?

No, what are the sick to be offended? They already offended them, did not give their minds …)))

I was in situation number 2. DPS wrote that the oncoming lane and deprivation. I had a Sumel judge to prove that the “brick” was not a comrade-in-law took my side and was a fine of 500 rubles.

This is what infuriates the most. What they do not carefully or did not legally take their rights. And they will not be anything for it. And you waste time and ride in court.

Similarly with OSAGO, they entered and free, but go to independent and lawyers and prove that not a fool

This is what infuriates the most. What they do not carefully or did not legally take their rights. And they will not be anything for it. And you waste time and ride in court.

Just if you get down to business, you need to bring it to the end.
And it was necessary to punish a specific Gayets at 12.35, for 20,000 rubles.
IMHO

There is not always time and necessary knowledge for this. Yes, and that 20 tr for him. Will recoup for a shift.

I agree about time and knowledge.
I even agree that it will beat off … 🙂
But I can't agree with the fact that for him it's a trifle.
This is pure psychology, as with loans …
You take someone else's for a while, and you give YOURS forever.
So with the 20th such an employee will part with a very distressed expression on his face.
p.s.
Maybe I'm wrong, but…
Therefore, I always write IMHO, i.e. this is my purely personal opinion.

This is what pisses me off the most. That they do not care legally or illegally took away the rights. And they won't get anything for it. And you waste your time and go to court.

I agree, it’s just that these two sheep couldn’t explain what an oncoming lane is and what entry is prohibited. They probably saw such a sign for the first time)))

I got into situation number two.
At Novinsky passage, I left the parking lot under a brick (I didn’t really see the sign)
The traffic policeman took off his whole head (su … ah)
I had 254 rubles in my pocket, I raked everything out, even a trifle!

and was he not ashamed to rake out these unfortunate 254 rubles from a person, even in small change? sometimes people just go crazy

Good evening ! In fact, good night!))
Unfortunately, you can't get into his head!
He calmed down when his wallet was turned inside out in front of him!))

No wonder they say the devil is in the details. What kind of person do you have to be in order to calm down, only realizing that the person really has nothing else, the wallet is turned out empty. Not only that, with a probability of 99 percent, he would have nothing to prove your violation in court, but also to rake everything to the last penny, taking advantage of the fact that he managed to force a person to give everything away. He's not even a robber, just a nonentity

I agree with you 1000%!))

No wonder they say the devil is in the details. What kind of person do you have to be in order to calm down, only realizing that the person really has nothing else, the wallet is turned out empty. Not only that, with a probability of 99 percent, he would have nothing to prove your violation in court, but also to rake everything to the last penny, taking advantage of the fact that he managed to force a person to give everything away. He's not even a robber, just a nonentity

For all the time that I've been driving for more than twenty years, I met two of these characters! Banknote lovers!
For the most part, traffic police officers are normal people!
About five years ago, a traffic cop of gasoline brought me ten liters of gasoline and did not take the money! (I got up on the highway, the fuel ran out, it was in the winter!) I also helped fill it in! I still remember him fondly!

There are traffic cops who are slender, freshly shaven, stand like a soldier and communicate politely, you really want to hug them, by the way they let me go for a trip to the red arrow, but sometimes there is a pot-bellied cattle with a show-off and a cap on the back of his head, you want to give me such a face

Agree with you completely!

Good evening ! In fact, good night!))
Unfortunately, you can't get into his head!
And it was necessary to punish a specific Gayets at 12.35, for 20,000 rubles.

IMHO

There is not always time and necessary knowledge for this. Yes, and that 20 tr for him. Will recoup for a shift.

I agree about time and knowledge.

I even agree that it will beat off … 🙂
But I can't agree with the fact that for him it's a trifle.
This is pure psychology, as with loans …

You take someone else's for a while, and you give YOURS forever.
So with the 20th such an employee will part with a very distressed expression on his face.

p.s.
Maybe I'm wrong, but…
Therefore, I always write IMHO, i.e. this is my purely personal opinion.

This is what pisses me off the most. That they do not care legally or illegally took away the rights. And they won't get anything for it. And you waste your time and go to court.
I agree, it’s just that these two sheep couldn’t explain what an oncoming lane is and what entry is prohibited. They probably saw such a sign for the first time)))
I got into situation number two.
At Novinsky passage, I left the parking lot under a brick (I didn’t really see the sign)
The traffic policeman took off his whole head (su … ah)

I had 254 rubles in my pocket, I raked everything out, even a trifle!
and was he not ashamed to rake out these unfortunate 254 rubles from a person, even in small change? sometimes people just go crazy

Good evening ! In fact, good night!))

Unfortunately, you can't get into his head!

He calmed down when his wallet was turned inside out in front of him!))
No wonder they say the devil is in the details. What kind of person do you have to be in order to calm down, only realizing that the person really has nothing else, the wallet is turned out empty. Not only that, with a probability of 99 percent, he would have nothing to prove your violation in court, but also to rake everything to the last penny, taking advantage of the fact that he managed to force a person to give everything away. He's not even a robber, just a nonentity
I agree with you 1000%!))
No wonder they say the devil is in the details. What kind of person do you have to be in order to calm down, only realizing that the person really has nothing else, the wallet is turned out empty. Not only that, with a probability of 99 percent, he would have nothing to prove your violation in court, but also to rake everything to the last penny, taking advantage of the fact that he managed to force a person to give everything away. He's not even a robber, just a nonentity
For all the time that I've been driving for more than twenty years, I met two of these characters! Banknote lovers!

For the most part, traffic police officers are normal people!